For 18 days now, our country has been in a state of turmoil, and the situation appears to be getting more and more grave by the minute.
Like so many other former supporters of PTI, I did not have much objection to the demands put forth by IK, but have been against the "method" in which this entire protest has been carried out. The use of abusive language, the constant display of arrogance and indecency - and finally the resort to violence - by IK AND his supporters have most definitely permanently turned me off PTI.
I think one lesson to be learnt from history is that moral education is a vital prerequisite for any change, revolution, struggle or movement. Any real, long lasting revolution depends upon the character of the people, and especially the youth, who are part of the struggle or movement. Character building should be the first step in any change or revolution, people without character may be able to overthrow governments, but they cannot build nations.
Perhaps this lack of moral education and character building is the reason why most of the movements over the Islamic world within this half century, whether they are struggles for freedom, or endeavors to change existing sociopolitical systems, have not been successful. Change can never come from above, it has to first take place at the grass-roots level. Each and every individual of the society (or the political party, in this case) needs to first undergo a change in their individual character in order to strive for and implement that change at the bigger level.
Coming back to PTI, Imran Khan should have waited, whether it took 5 years or five deacdes, to first train and educate the young members of his party, who would then have been morally capable of creating a "naya Pakistan". At the moment we are witnessing violent acts carried out by these proponents of naya Pakistan, and the justification being given by their supporters is that since the system is corrupt, the only way to deal with it is through violence! Please tell me o thou proponents of Naya Pakistan, when did Quaid e Azam ever resort to or condone violence, in his entire political career? He was, after all, trying to create Pakistan, as you are now trying to create a "naya" Pakistan.
Moreover, over the course of time PTI has become something of a single-leader party, a one man show - with no one to actually succeed IK; and his adrenaline-driven, dancing and chanting supporters can't really be expected to evolve into leaders. Over the past few days it has become clear that IK is an ego- centric, dictatorial type of leader who does not hold much respect for the opinions of others, including other party leaders, especially if they challenge his decisions. Due to this attitude, the few sane politicians that stand with him now will eventually leave, one by one, following Javed Hashmi's example.
An important thing that IK and his supporters really need to understand is that when you want to bring about a "change", your attitude needs to be different from the conventional one that dominates the political system. Whenever I try to point out to a PTI supporter the inappropriate and indecent language and behaviour of IK and his followers, I get the answer, "Well, Nawaz Sharif and PML N supporters also use the same kind of language, look at Hamza Shahbaz, etc, etc." Well, as per my knowledge, NS and his party never professed a change; the only one who claims that he can and will change the system is IK. The question is, when you can't even bring about a change in your own attitudes, how in God's name are you going to change the system with the same typical political "ghunda gardi" that has dominated our system for decades?
Khan Sahab's hate speeches have caused so much division amongst the whole nation, when according to our spititual father, Iqbal, "love conquers all" (محبت فاتح عالم). He is further giving a fine education to our children by teaching them that you can call anyone "bay-sharam" and "bay-ghairat" in public. So much for our culture and traditions!
Like so many other former supporters of PTI, I did not have much objection to the demands put forth by IK, but have been against the "method" in which this entire protest has been carried out. The use of abusive language, the constant display of arrogance and indecency - and finally the resort to violence - by IK AND his supporters have most definitely permanently turned me off PTI.
I think one lesson to be learnt from history is that moral education is a vital prerequisite for any change, revolution, struggle or movement. Any real, long lasting revolution depends upon the character of the people, and especially the youth, who are part of the struggle or movement. Character building should be the first step in any change or revolution, people without character may be able to overthrow governments, but they cannot build nations.
Perhaps this lack of moral education and character building is the reason why most of the movements over the Islamic world within this half century, whether they are struggles for freedom, or endeavors to change existing sociopolitical systems, have not been successful. Change can never come from above, it has to first take place at the grass-roots level. Each and every individual of the society (or the political party, in this case) needs to first undergo a change in their individual character in order to strive for and implement that change at the bigger level.
Coming back to PTI, Imran Khan should have waited, whether it took 5 years or five deacdes, to first train and educate the young members of his party, who would then have been morally capable of creating a "naya Pakistan". At the moment we are witnessing violent acts carried out by these proponents of naya Pakistan, and the justification being given by their supporters is that since the system is corrupt, the only way to deal with it is through violence! Please tell me o thou proponents of Naya Pakistan, when did Quaid e Azam ever resort to or condone violence, in his entire political career? He was, after all, trying to create Pakistan, as you are now trying to create a "naya" Pakistan.
Moreover, over the course of time PTI has become something of a single-leader party, a one man show - with no one to actually succeed IK; and his adrenaline-driven, dancing and chanting supporters can't really be expected to evolve into leaders. Over the past few days it has become clear that IK is an ego- centric, dictatorial type of leader who does not hold much respect for the opinions of others, including other party leaders, especially if they challenge his decisions. Due to this attitude, the few sane politicians that stand with him now will eventually leave, one by one, following Javed Hashmi's example.
An important thing that IK and his supporters really need to understand is that when you want to bring about a "change", your attitude needs to be different from the conventional one that dominates the political system. Whenever I try to point out to a PTI supporter the inappropriate and indecent language and behaviour of IK and his followers, I get the answer, "Well, Nawaz Sharif and PML N supporters also use the same kind of language, look at Hamza Shahbaz, etc, etc." Well, as per my knowledge, NS and his party never professed a change; the only one who claims that he can and will change the system is IK. The question is, when you can't even bring about a change in your own attitudes, how in God's name are you going to change the system with the same typical political "ghunda gardi" that has dominated our system for decades?
Khan Sahab's hate speeches have caused so much division amongst the whole nation, when according to our spititual father, Iqbal, "love conquers all" (محبت فاتح عالم). He is further giving a fine education to our children by teaching them that you can call anyone "bay-sharam" and "bay-ghairat" in public. So much for our culture and traditions!
